The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is reportedly leveraging an under-the-radar legal provision to conduct surveillance on journalists, non-profit organizations, and labor unions. This practice has drawn criticism for its potential to infringe upon the work of these entities and the privacy of individuals associated with them.
The use of this obscure law by the DHS raises questions about transparency and accountability in government surveillance practices. Critics argue that such methods could chill free speech and investigative journalism, as well as hinder the operations of organizations working in the public interest.
This development highlights ongoing concerns about the scope and application of government surveillance powers and their impact on civil liberties. The specific law in question and the extent of its use by the DHS are now under scrutiny.
DHS Accused of Using Obscure Law to Surveil Journalists and Non-Profits
15 stories · 5 sources
#surveillance #privacy #camerasOther digests
- 2026-09-17 — Waymo Robotaxi Stops, Alerts Police Over Teen Passengers' Alleged Firearm Violation
- 2026-09-16 — Boston Cancels Flock Contract Over Data Sharing Violations
- 2026-09-15 — Boston Cancels Flock Contract Over Nationwide Data Sharing Violations
- 2026-09-14 — Innocent Woman Jailed as Towns Dump Flock Cameras Amid Misuse Concerns
- 2026-09-13 — Flock Cameras Used to Arrest Child for Playground Activity
- 2026-09-12 — LG Denies TV Spying Claims Amid Growing Privacy Concerns
- 2026-09-11 — New Jersey Bans All-Day Cellphone Use in Schools Amid Privacy Concerns
- 2026-09-10 — Judge Dismisses LinkedIn "BrowserGate" Lawsuits Over Extension Scanning
- 2026-09-09 — Apple Watch's New Listening Feature Sparks Privacy Concerns
- 2026-09-08 — Police Express Concerns Over Meta Smart Glasses' Recording Capabilities
- 2026-09-07 — Grindr Settles UK Lawsuit Over Sharing HIV Status with Advertisers
- 2026-09-06 — Flock Camera Backlash Grows Amid Data Privacy Fears and Misuse Allegations
- 2026-09-05 — Joliet Police Officers Under Investigation for Alleged Flock Camera Misuse
- 2026-09-04 — US Military Disables Ad Trackers on Troop Devices Amid Foreign Targeting Fears
- 2026-09-03 — Senator Demands NSA Guidance on VPN Usage Amidst Privacy Concerns
- 2026-09-02 — FBI Probes Data Breach After Driver's License Appears for Sale Hours After Rental
- 2026-09-01 — Lawmakers Seek Probe into Trump Administration's Secret Surveillance of Americans
- 2026-08-31 — Florida Orders Removal of Flock Cameras from State Highways
- 2026-08-30 — Texas Halts Flock Camera Funding Amid Growing Privacy Backlash and Misuse Allegations
- 2026-08-29 — DHS Accused of Using Obscure Law to Surveil Journalists and Non-Profits
- 2026-08-28 — Flock Surveillance Cameras Face Growing Scrutiny and Legislative Action
- 2026-08-27 — Cities Dismantle Flock Cameras as Public Outcry and Vandalism Escalate
- 2026-08-26 — Ring Enhances Privacy with New Default Encryption, Limiting Police Access
- 2026-08-25 — DHS Agents Infiltrated Anti-ICE Protests, Posing as Citizens
- 2026-08-24 — Man in Darth Vader Costume Advocates for Flock Cameras at San Diego Council Meeting
- 2026-08-23 — TikTok Settles US Children's Privacy Lawsuit for $400 Million Amid Surveillance Concerns
- 2026-08-22 — Flock Cameras Spark Controversy: From Traffic Tickets to Darth Vader Protests
- 2026-08-21 — Darth Vader Impersonator Mocks San Diego's Use of Flock Surveillance Cameras
- 2026-08-20 — Comcast Router Motion Sensing Ignites User Privacy Backlash
- 2026-08-19 — Officer Misused Flock Cameras to Track Estranged Wife 717 Times